An All in One

Posts by Willie

How do you feel about 12,500 to 1 odds?  I’d let that shit ride but i’m a dreamer.  Hope you guess my entertainment.  Last week, I revisited the town of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, a friend of mine married on Saturday.  I comprised one-half of the best man, which makes me a better man at least.

During my speech, I reminded the crowd of my friend’s behavior toward me, but more broadly, actions that exhibited inner character.  In the 4th grade, when I awkward and socially inept, my friend stood up for me.  He didn’t have to.

Upon my return flight to Philadelphia, an airline error back in Denver added another 30 minutes to the regularly scheduled takeoff.  The overhead, god-like boon suggested those who did not have a connecting flight in Philly, do not stand, but stay seated and excuse those who trespass and leave the plane first.

In word, it was a grand suggestion – Stay seated, good citizens, while others continue their pilgrimage toward unknown destinations.  Of course, passengers carry on freewill with them, with faculties to decide whether to stand or remain seated.

When the moment of judgement arrived, (I admit) I was skeptical.  Would the captain’s voice shepherd the travelers’ goodwill?  I grinned at the unfolding revelation before me, as the passengers, unspoken as one, made decision.


branding places: content muse to Anthony, the writer

Posts by Anthony

What do you want to be when you grow-up on Google?

A few years ago, I wanted to be “Content Muse.”

Things done changed.

If we’re lucky, life, and search engines within, change, posing new experiences, challenges, or whatever labels we use.

Recently, I’ve taken the novel approach of calling myself Anthony Pensabene, the writer.  The epithet has a nice ring and much nicer than devilish monickers thrown about my horns by past observers.

Minutes from now, I’ll have another idea, be someone different, not fundamentally influencing immediate business yet chosen nicknames and aliases influence SERs.

Webmaster Tools identifies the following as top-search queries related to my site:

These, most-linked, incoming terms:

These, all-time search queries identified by

I’ve done well naturally (and otherwise) aligning digital properties with a sought branded term: “content muse.”

Congratulations to me, but like a fickle fat boy in a candy shop, I’ve changed direction.

I don’t desire targeting ‘content muse’ any longer.

I want Anthony Pensabene, the writer.

I’ll need to change peoples’ references as well as re-engineer digital legacies.

For example, a number of links, associated to this specific Twitter profile, influence an “Anthony Pensabene” search.

I suspect whomever adopted the handle “content_muse” kept “Anthony Pensabene” the account holder’s name.

My new account’s name, “Mr. A,” (mystery..get it! #mindblown) is not helping.

I’ll modify the account holder’s name to see how it influences the SERs related to a search for “Anthony Pensabene.”

My new Twitter handle reflects fresh endeavors of branding (@writer_for_hire), or changed ‘search major’ if we’re making a college ed. comparison.

It’s easy to ‘live in the moment,’ expecting to feel the same, with similar goals and desires regarding specific branding terms (SEO, online marketing, marketing).

Some thoughts on branding, “Anthony Pensabene, the writer”:

- Changing peoples’ perceptions through seeing it in text (emails)

- Changing account names on social media profiles (and possibly including name of blog – remember, my blog’s ‘old’ name used to be “content muse”)

- Writing a post describing the difference between ‘content muse’ and ‘Anthony, the writer’

Much Ado About Substance

Posts by Willie

Shakespeare’s birthday recently passed.

I wonder if the 400 year-old author grows tired of misrepresentations and misunderstandings.  I would.

Plays vs Books

In my understanding, William Shakespeare was an actor and playwright (later producer as well), his written words intended for an actor (all men) to speak upon stage.

Books, recorded and bound text, entertain as well, yet the original intentions of authors differing, they understanding respective opportunities and restraints associated to the given medium.

Calling Shakespeare “a writer” hardly crosses the woods’ threshold.  Consider the layers:

- He wrote lines for actors (pay attention to sounds, gesticulations, movements of others on stage…because Shakespeare intended it.)

- His audience consisted of commoners and elite members of the royal court (Bawdy or intellectual gestures of the 16th and 17th centuries are inextricably associated to the texts.  Think of Shakespeare like a Dave Chappelle of his time; he knew what prejudices, contradictions, limitations, etc existed within society, playing the audience’s ability to recognize references of the current era like a fiddle.  Some jokes targeted ‘commoners,’ while highbrow puns reserved for the appreciation of formally educated listeners.)

- The ‘stories’ host real-time action, creating ‘vivid worlds’ for a ‘reader’ that were originally intended for a present observer (The trajectory of stories and subsequent action would have to necessitate physical, on-stage action.  Otherwise, there would be nothing to ‘act.’)

Shakespeare wrote poems and plays, and many observe entire sections in plays as poetry.  He never, in modern terms, wrote a book…or intended it.  He maintained written versions of his plays (likely varied forms of each) for subsequent productions, and penned a number of sonnets while playhouses closed in the 1590s.

Telling vs. Showing with a Story

Scholars, squabblers, and literature students (who like to hear themselves speak), debate themes, ‘lessons,’ and metaphors found throughout Shakespeare’s plays.  Like Samuel Clemens’ name, Shakespeare’s plays are two fathoms deep (at least); there’s a surface story as well as implicit lessons, philosophical prompts, archetypal debates, etc existing deeper within.

To say ‘Huckleberry Finn’ implies racism, elitism, hypocrisy, inequality, etc is easier than introducing a story that hides explicit statements and subject matter in the background while entertaining via immediate context.

No one likes being told but everyone loves being intelligent, feeling that light go on.  Writers and playwrights know this and that’s why they choose to wrap blue ribbon thoughts around offered words .

Consider the film, Inception.  DiCaprio’s character infiltrates others’ dreams to implicitly influence thoughts in real time.  The man who decides to ‘go his own way’ rather than run his father’s previously successful business is actually a wish of the father’s competitor and not organically comprised by the son.  DiCaprio’s character carefully orchestrates the son’s mind to entertain the competitor’s wishes.

Shakespeare’s plays do the same.  He’s not providing a diatribe on the whimsical ways of young love, power, ‘fate,’ and the man-made shackles that pose such problems/treasures on our mortal coils.  Rather, he presents a story of warring families, teen love,  and ill timing, culminating in an ending that cannot be changed no matter how many times we ‘read’ the play or painfully ‘experience’ Romeo and Juliet’s last moments together.

Parallelism to Complete Thought, Intrigue Readers and Make Sales

Posts by Anthony

Associated Resources:

The University of Wisconsin


Purdue Writing Lab

Greetings, faithful readers (Bubba chases a firefly in the night, leaving no one else).

Last time, we discussed using transitions in sales copy and emails for better conversions.

While Anthony attends to in-house secretarial work, I have another helpful post for you, one that will please you, create better sentences, and continue my legacy!

Actually, the topic is upon one of my own weaknesses.  (But, Willie, why would you tell us about your weaknesses?!)  It’s a gift …

Let’s consider how errors in parallelism occur.


I wrote an epic post, took a bubble bath, and then was vacuuming peanut butter cookie (my favorite, readers!) crumbs from the carpet.

The sentence sucks. It’s oddly presented.  While thoughts clear, associated logic sound, and readers (still?) engaged, rearranging the sentence as to maintain same (past) tense is preferred:

I wrote an epic post, took a bubble bath, and vacuumed peanut butter cookie crumbs.

All the above descriptive points in past tense.  (Note: Writing software may not identify errors in parallel logic or respective software default not accordingly set.)


Another error associated to parallelism is maintaining ‘voice.’  Sometimes, I’m active and then I start being passive – all in the same sentence. Depending on desired affect or poetic cadence, one may do so, yet low wordcount and active voice is oft preferred regarding ad and sales-related copy.

Let’s use the above sentence again:

I wrote an epic post, took a bubble bath, and then was vacuuming peanut butter cookie crumbs from the carpet.

Not only did I use a different tense but switched to being passive in the above sentence.  Active vs. Passive Voice deserves an entire post, but for brevity, concentrate on active and passive voice regarding parallel structure.

I wrote (active voice) an epic post, took (active) a bubble bath, and vacuumed (active) the carpet.


I do this often on holidays, various strong coffees, and on every other Wacky Wednesday.  I switch the implementation of prepositions, either varying them or presenting inconsistently, which could confuse the reader or make for a poor sentence.

Let’s revisit the error:

I do this often on holidays, various strong coffees, and on every other Wacky Wednesday.

“This” takes place “on”… 1, 2, 3. Keep the series consistent and aligned with apropos prepositions.

The above is inconsistent regarding included preposition and the associated preposition is awkward and wrong.

It’s more street to say you’re ‘on’ coffee.  And, since the other two events relate to times rather than states of being, I fucked it all up…so to speak.

Here is a better version:

I do this during holidays, coffee breaks, and alternating Wacky Wednesdays.

Now, get to (better) writing.

I tutor, provide writing services, and consult on case-by-case basiseseseseses. (That last part is a joke – the ‘es’s not mention of hiring me.